Click on the links below to join the conversations on life, love and everything...

Six Stages of the Essay Writing Process - 1

Stage One: Getting ideas

For an essay, your aim is to persuade or inform your readers about the topic, so you want to end up with ideas that will persuade or inform. Where do you start? Should you find out about the topic by doing research first? But how do you know what you need to research? Like so much of writing, it’s a chicken-and egg sort of thing. The thing is not to worry about whether you’ve got a chicken or an egg. You need both and it doesn’t matter which you start with. The place to start is to put down everything you already know or think about the topic. Once you get that in a line, you’ll see where to go next. Don’t worry yet about your theme or your structure. You’re not writing an essay yet—you’re just exploring. The more you explore, the more ideas you’ll get, and the more ideas you have, the better your essay will be.


Making a list

Writing an essay takes several different kinds of skills, but the first one is easy. We can all write a list. Start the list by writing down the most important word or phrase (the key word) from the assignment, then putting down every thought that comes to you about it.

Making a cluster diagram

A cluster diagram is really just another kind of list, but instead of listing straight down the page, you list in clusters around a key word. Think of the spokes of a wheel radiating out from the hub. Something about the physical layout of a cluster diagram often makes it easier for ideas to start flowing. You can jump around from cluster to cluster, adding a thought here and a thought there.

Researching

When you write an essay, you’re usually expected to find out what other people have already thought about the subject. Your own ideas are important too, but they should be built on a foundation of what’s gone before. You don’t have to reinvent the wheel. Since most essays rely on this kind of foundation, you need to know how to do it properly. I’ll take a moment here to talk about how to research (otherwise known as independent investigation). Research is about getting some hard information on your subject: actual facts, actual figures. The sad thing about research is that usually only a small percentage of it ends up in your final draft. But like the hidden nine-tenths of an iceberg, it’s got to be there to hold up the bit you can see. You often research several times during the writing process. The first time you mightn’t know exactly what you’ll be writing about, so research will be fairly broad-based. As the essay starts to take shape, you’ll have narrowed the topic down. At that stage you might research again to find specific details.


How do you research?

First you have to find your source of information. You might look at books, journals, videos, newspapers, on the Internet, on CD-ROM. You go to reference books like dictionaries and encyclopedias. You might also do your own research: interviewing people, conducting an experiment, doing a survey. In the case of my topic, reading the novels themselves is research (the novels are ‘primary sources’), and so is finding anything that critics or reviewers might have said about them (these are ‘secondary sources’).

A word about acknowledgement

Because you’re piggy-backing on other people’s work, you have to let your reader know that—to give credit where credit is due. You can do this either in the text of the essay, in footnotes or in a list of sources at the end. Once you’ve found your source, you can’t just lift slabs of it and plonk them into your essay. You have to transform the information by putting it into your own words and shaping it for your own purposes. An essential first step in this process is taking notes. If you can summarise a piece of information in a short note, it means you’ve understood it and made it your own. Later, when you write it out in a sentence, it will be your own sentence, organised for your own purposes.

How to take notes

Before you start taking notes, put a heading that tells you exactly what the source is. This means you can find it again quickly if you need to and you can acknowledge it. In the case of a book, you should note the name of the author, the title of the book, the date and place of publication, and the page or chapter number. The call number (the library number on the spine) is also useful. (It’s tempting to skip this step, and I often have. The price is high, though—frustrating hours spent flipping through half-a-dozen books looking for one particular paragraph so you can acknowledge the source of your information or find some more detail.) With the net, make sure to bookmark interesting or relevant pages visited.

  • Use the table of contents and the index to go straight to the relevant parts.
  • Skim-read to save time once you’ve got to the relevant parts.
  • Write down the main words of the idea with just enough connecting words for your note to make sense.
  • Put only one point per line.
  • Sometimes turning the information into a diagram is the best way to make notes.
  • Put your notes under headings so you can see the information in bundles. Often, the research is already organised under headings: you can just copy those.
  • If you can’t see how to reduce a big lump of research to a few snappy lines, try the ‘MDE’ trick: find its Main idea, then its Details, then any Examples.
  • Develop a shorthand that works for you—shorten words (for example, char. for character), use graphics (for example, sideways arrows to show cause and effect, up and down arrows to show things increasing or decreasing).

The cheat’s note-taking

People often ‘take notes’ by highlighting or underlining the relevant parts of a book or article. This is certainly easier than making your own notes, but it’s not nearly as useful. The moment when you work out how to summarise an idea in your own words is the moment when that idea becomes yours. Just running a highlighter across someone else’s words doesn’t do that—the idea stays in their words, in their brain. It hasn’t been digested by you.


Freewriting

Freewriting is just a fancy word for talking onto the page—a way of thinking aloud about the topic in an unstructured way. It’s like the ‘free association’ exercises that psychologists use: it’s just nonstop writing. The reason freewriting works is that you can let your brain off the leash for a while and send it out to find ideas. Ideas are shy little things and they won’t come if you try to bully them, or if you keep criticising them. The important thing with freewriting is not to stop and think. Just keep the ideas flowing out the end of your pen onto the page. It’s true that your essay needs to be thought-out and planned, and it will be. But this isn’t the essay—this is just another way of getting ideas for the essay. There’s a time to question whether these ideas are useful. But that time isn’t now. Now is the time to invite in any ideas that may happen by.

Asian Demography - leader & feature articles


The decline of Asian marriage

"Asia's lonely hearts"

Women are rejecting marriage in Asia. The social implications are serious



Asian demography

"The flight from marriage"

Asians are marrying later, and less, than in the past. This has profound implications for women, traditional family life and Asian politics

Aug 20th 2011 | SEOUL AND TAIPEI | from the print edition of The Economist


pdf of text/transcript 2.6 MB

audio files (mp3) of both articles 9.8 MB

Comment if you want to. Don't worry about this material if the topic does not interest you!

Holidaymakers' Complaints


From Thomas Cook Holidays - listing some guests' complaints during the season.

1. "I think it should be explained in the brochure that the local store does not sell proper biscuits like custard creams or ginger nuts."

2. "It's lazy of the local shopkeepers to close in the afternoons. I often needed to buy things during 'siesta' time - this should be banned

3. "On my holiday to Goa in India, I was disgusted to find that almost every restaurant served curry. I don't like spicy food at all."

4. "We booked an excursion to a water park but no-one told us we had to bring our swimming costumes and towels."

5. A tourist at a top African game lodge over looking a water hole, who spotted a visibly aroused elephant, complained that the sight of this rampant beast ruined his honeymoon by making him feel "inadequate".


6. A woman threatened to call police after claiming that she'd been locked in by staff. When in fact, she had mistaken the "do not disturb" sign on the back of the door as a warning to remain in the room.

7. "The beach was too sandy."

8. "We found the sand was not like the sand in the brochure. Your brochure shows the sand as yellow but it was white."

9. A guest at a Novotel in Australia complained his soup was too thick and strong. He was inadvertently slurping the gravy at the time.

10. "Topless sunbathing on the beach should be banned. The holiday was ruined as my husband spent all day looking at other women."

11. "We bought' Ray-Ban' sunglasses for five Euros from a street trader, only to find out they were fake." 12. "No-one told us there would be fish in the sea. The children were startled."

13. "There was no egg slicer in the apartment..."

14. "We went on holiday to Spain and had a problem with the taxi drivers as they were all Spanish..."

15. "The roads were uneven.."

16. "It took us nine hours to fly home from Jamaica to England it only took the Americans three hours to get home."

17. "I compared the size of our one-bedroom apartment to our friends' three-bedroom apartment and ours was significantly smaller."

18. "The brochure stated: 'No hairdressers at the accommodation’. We’re trainee hairdressers - will we be OK staying there?"

19. "There are too many Spanish people. The receptionist speaks Spanish. The food is Spanish. Too many foreigners now live abroad'"

20. "We had to queue outside with no air conditioning."


21. "It is your duty as a tour operator to advise us of noisy or unruly guests before we travel."

22. "I was bitten by a mosquito - no-one said they could bite."

23. "My fiancé and I booked a twin-bedded room but we were placed in a double-bedded room. We now hold you responsible for the fact that I find myself pregnant. This would not have happened if you had put us in the room that we booked."

Spot The Error #1



Can you see the mistake in the text on the memorial plaque above?

Answer in the COMMENTS below!

Moral Dilemma #1


You have a very annoying colleague at work. Let's call her Prima. She isn't very good at her job. You are always correcting her mistakes and always covering up for her when her mistakes cause trouble for everyone in your department. On top of it all, she has very irritating personal habits like eating smelly fried beans (pete goreng) in the office and listening to D'Massive on her computer. One day she applies for a transfer to another department. The department's boss asks you for a reference. In other words, do you recommend her to the boss? What do you do next?

Your answers and thoughts please in the COMMENTS below.

Make Time to Study Smarter: Part 1

Jim's alarm jolts him awake at 6 a.m.
Because his job keeps him up until midnight most weeknights, he schedules most of his study time for the mornings before classes. And makes sure he never takes a class before 10 a.m.

Unfortunately (for his grades), most mornings he's so tired, he just automatically punches the snooze alarm and sleeps at least another hour.
On a good morning, he drags himself out of bed and sits down at his desk to study.
Today seems to be a good morning. He's up by 7, has two cups of coffee, and opens his business ethics text. But Jim, who recognized long ago that he was not a morning person, finds his attention wandering. All too soon, he ends up nestling his head on his book and nodding off . . . until his roommate shakes him awake and informs him he's already late for his first class.
Well, maybe it wasn't going to be such a good morning after all.
Jim's classes end around 1 p.m. He treats himself to lunch in the student union building and, afterward, to an hour of video games. "I deserve a break," he convinces himself. "This day has been totally frustrating so far."


Despite his best efforts, he feels guilty anyway, because he isn't using his free time to study. By 2:30, with only a couple of hours left before he has to go to work, he reluctantly leaves the video arcade. He's falling further behind in his classes every day, so he knows he has to use the rest of the afternoon for studying.
Filled with resolve to catch up on all of his school work before he goes to his job, he heads for the library. As he walks, he begins to mentally catalog the various readings, papers, and tests he has to work on. He quickly slows his pace when it suddenly dawns on him that catching up before the end of the term would require five or six hours of studying . . . every day . . . including weekends.
By the time he gets to the library to study, he's discouraged again. Obviously, anything he can do in the next two hours is a miniscule drop in the bucket compared to what has to be done. Nevertheless, he resolves to do at least a little bit.
As he pulls his books out of his backpack, a scrap of note paper flutters out. It's the piece of paper he wrote his history assignment on two weeks ago . . . the term paper that's due in two days!
Not only has he not started it yet, his history book is back at his apartment. He decides he'd better run home to get itthe next two hours is the only time he has to work on it before it's due.
On his way home, he runs into a friend. The two of them commiserate about their impossible schedules. By the time Jim finally gets home, he's decided to ask for an extension on his history assignment. It will be the second extension he's asked for, which means he's got two overdue assignments, one other term paper, and four finals to prepare for . . . in the next two weeks.

There's one hour left. "How can I do a paper in 60 minutes?" Jim groans. Deciding he can't, he throws his book bag on his desk and surrenders to the time pressures. There's no way he can get any real studying done in just an hour. He crumples on the couch, turns on the TV, and, as the audience gasps at the sight of a 350-lb transvestite sumo wrestler on Jerry Springer, asks himself, "Why is my life so difficult?"













[To be continued...]

Think about your own approach to the writing process

Pen and Computer

You can write only with your brain; but whether to process your thoughts with a computer or pen and paper is your first practical choice as a writer. I suppose it is still possible to ignore the computer and write just with pencil and paper. A surprising number of writers, including Martin Amis, A. S. Byatt, Ted Hughes, John Irving, Joyce Carol Oates, Susan Sontag, John Updike, and Edmund White prefer longhand for serious writing. But the advantages of the computer are so great that it seems almost irresponsible to pass them up. A computer greatly accelerates editing procedures, allowing you to take a piece through far more drafts than you could otherwise. On-screen correction is so easy that people of all ages find the process relaxing, even pleasurable. Computers give a sense of freedom from lasting error that no one who has experienced it will want to give up. I shall never forget the excitement I felt, twenty-five years ago, when I discovered that words had ceased to be indelible. So in this book I shall take for granted that you will probably use a computer for some, if not all, the processes of writing.

Many people use a computer throughout, and never feel the need to print out hard copy. Mathematicians, in particular, produce papers and even books entirely onscreen. In principle, it is possible to write and publish electronically, without ever lifting pen or pencil. For some, however, especially those engaged in literary work, this may not always be the way to get the most out of the computer.

Computers of the present generation have certain limitations, arising from the screen display, which for some people tend to complicate the process of writing long pieces. Even with the best flat-screen monitor you can’t comfortably read long texts. And you can’t actively browse with any clear sense of where you are in the text.

Good writing depends on extensive reading, not only previous reading of other works but also frequent scans of your own piece, the one you’re working on. Yet if it runs to any considerable length, uninterrupted reading on-screen is difficult. A monitor’s field of view is necessarily local, limited to about 150 words—much less than a printed page. This is fine for drafting a postcard; but not for extensive reading or browsing. To scroll through successive screenfuls is hardly an adequate substitute: it is too fragmentary and remote from ordinary reading. In active browsing you need to be able to skim or read a page or two here, check the index there, and jump back or forward at will, always aware of structure and proportion, always aware of each passage’s relation to the text as a whole.

Working by the screenful can have the unfortunate consequence of smoothing your writing prematurely. For onscreen correction is so easy that the grammar and word choices gel too soon, without enough consideration being given to the overall sequence or the underlying structure. Decisions about the piece as a whole may tend to be passed over, so that the end result is polished enough, but boring: flat, shapeless, even garrulous.


Some have gone so far as to argue that the fluency and facility of composing on-screen are positively bad for writing, since they make you forget the reader’s experience of your piece. The beautiful screen is supposed to delude us into a false consciousness, flattering us with the illusion that technical procedures (correction of typos, format changes, boilerplate insertions, rearrangement of phrases, and the like) can do it all by magic. You cast wonderful
spells, but find they are somehow not enough. But the evidence for all this (cited by Edward Mendelson in a 1990 Academic Computing article) is no longer thought compelling. In any case, the remedy is a very simple one: any limitation you feel in the computer’s display can be overcome by printing out hard copy. I shall assume, in fact, that you will work from printouts whenever you find it more convenient to do so.

Composing on-screen, revising as you go, is obviously fine for short letters, emails, and routine reports. But many people find that anything longer than 250 words or so—and certainly any competitive or ambitious piece that needs much thought—is better printed out for reading and drafting. For many writers drafting is not a detour but the best way forward.

An additional reason for alternating screen and paper applies only to some writers, who find their thinking in front of a screen slower. After a time the computer has for them a dulling, even stupefying effect. Others report quite the reverse, finding that the computer’s pleasurability encourages thinking on-screen, as Michael Heim claims in Electric Language (1987). People differ; but it does no harm to take a break from the screen every half hour or so, for your circulation’s sake.

Some writers find it helps to jot down the earliest draft on paper, where they can vary the size of words for emphasis, use abbreviations, and resort to private symbols. Even illegible scribbles can be turned to account: paper writers can postpone resolution of ambiguities, defer grammatical structuring, delay lexical choices, allow their minds to explore vague surrounding associations, and perhaps encounter serendipities. For them, the computer closes off too many syntactic options, and calls for definition of ideas still inchoate. Other writers, however, more at ease on the keyboard, value the rapid rearrangement and deletion that can be done on-screen. Inserts can go in as they come to mind, without need for memos or post-its. In drafting, the choice between pen and keyboard may be partly a matter of age, partly of training and temperament.

At any rate, when you have reached the stage of a rough outline, you may want to print it out for ease of reading. Working with the draft on paper, you can read it more easily, and see whether each passage is proportioned and positioned where it should be. But don’t forget to have the latest draft on-screen, ready for you to slot in corrections, references, and new ideas.

Except for a complete beginner, computer spellchecks can waste time. They have a way of giving the correct spelling of the wrong word. Better to have a good dictionary on disk (or on your desk), and consult it for yourself. When you work on the final draft, though, a spellcheck sometimes finds inconsistencies. A grammar check, too, if it is a very good one, can be instructive. But again it is better still to learn some grammar. If you could have a program to write the whole piece for you without effort on your part, would you buy it? If the answer is yes, read no further.

Taken from “How to Write” by Alastair Fowler (Oxford University Press 2006)



Here are some possible 'essay' questions on this topic/article:

  1. Will this article change the way you approach your writing? I meanhonestly and in reality. Explain your answer.
  2. Is it possible that computers have changed the skill and nature of the writing process forever? Explain your answer.
  3. 'Pen & Paper' - it's starting to sound old fashioned! What key advantage would be lost if we had only PCs and no pens or paper anymore?
  4. "The computer is great as a writing tool - but without a printer, it's not really as great as you think it is." What is your opinion about this comment?

Cartoon: Calvin & Hobbes

Part 1










Part 2










Part 3










Part 4










Part 5










Part 6










Clicking on each cartoon will give you a bigger, clearer version to look at.

Optional Task:

What do you think of the style and content of this cartoon strip?

Interpreting poetry or lyrics 1

LEMONADE


Let's not be precious
Life takes gauze and glue
Wide eyes will get us there
On our coconut hooves



Rising tides bring trouble
Strand old tubs upon the sand
Navigate these shallows
Chase birds with our bare hands



We don't want to be special
We'd have too much to lose
Line up the world's lemons
Suck them all and choose
Make some lemonade
Or lose


Diamonds on the table
Hearts upon on their knees
A tragedy of clubs and spades
In a hand of cards as lame as these



So trickle down you pennies
Quench my thirsty purse
Chase away the bitter birds who
Peck bare earth and dream of worms



I don't need to be special
I have too much to lose
Line up the world's lemons
Suck them all and choose
Make some lemonade or lose
Drink your lemonade or
You lose


(this post is about the words: you don't need to hear the song if you don't want to)

What is this song about? What do the words mean? Which bits mean something to you and which bits are incomprehensible? Which of the three versions do you prefer?